5 Ways Sherlock Holmes Inspired Forensic Investigation

sherlock holmes stamp

In solving a problem of this sort, the grand thing is to be able to reason backward.” So wrote Sir Arthur Conan Doyle as his literary counterpart, Sherlock Holmes, in A Study in Scarlet. Conan Doyle was a scientist and a trained physician, so when he imagined the great detective, he used science to set him apart from other crime practitioners. Where a policeman of the day would round up the usual suspects and beat a confession out of an unlucky bloke, Holmes employed deduction, the scientific method and an acute sense of observation.


“I am glad of all the details … whether they seem to you to be relevant or not.”
The Adventure of the Copper Beeches

 1. Detective work.

The fictional Holmes revelled in tiny details, and caught everyone by surprise by defining a subject with details relating to height, weight, gait, carrying a load, occupation and other surprising summaries simply by observing a wet foot print in a garden. He also explained how the evidence led to his accurate conclusion. And when the perpetrator was finally discovered and captured, the physical description was uncanny.

In addition, his ability to ‘reason backwards’ (looking at the criminal act and working his way backwards to lead him to evidence) helped guide him to a conclusion, a motive and a culprit.


“As you may know, no two human fingerprints are ever alike.”
The Brass Elephant

2. Fingerprints.

Holmes identified and used fingerprints initially in The Sign of Four, published in 1890. Scotland Yard did not adapt fingerprint recovery, comparison and identification process until almost 11 years after The Sign of Four was published. He did not use fingerprints as the defining evidence, however — generally, the case was irrefutably solved by a variety of clues leading to the correct solution.

In The Adventure of the Norwood Builder, Inspector Lestrade thought he had his murderer when he was able to match a bloody print to John Hector McFarlane, an obvious suspect. Holmes was able to prove that MacFarlane was innocent.

Today, fingerprints have become a significant method of identification for human individuals. Now stored in computer databases, analyzed and compared within seconds, fingerprints still require corroborating evidence to tell the whole story.


“But what is the use of a cipher message without the cipher?”
The Valley of Fear

3. Ciphers.

In many cases in Victorian times, clues were hidden in ciphers, or coded messages which required a ‘key’ to ascertain letter substitutions. In The Dancing Men, Holmes analyzed 160 separate cyphers, determined that the letter ‘e’ was the most common letter in the English language, and was able to proceed to the answer. In “The Gloria Scott”, he deduced that every third word in lines of gibberish created the message that frightened Old Trevor.

Many of these cipher techniques were applied during the World Wars to decipher messages from the enemy, and law enforcement in many countries have also worked through ciphers using procedures described by Conan Doyle.


“Footprints?” ” Yes, footprints.” “A man’s or a woman’s?”
“Mr. Holmes, they were the footprints of a giant hound.”
The Hound of the Baskervilles

4. Footprints.

From the very first story in the Holmes series to the 57th story (the Lion’s Mane from 1926), 29 of the 60 stories revealed and solved footprint evidence. Footprints were found in soil, mud, clay. They were on carpet, in snow, ash and even on drapes and doors — each mark was worth discussion, each print told a story that was instrumental to the outcome.

Sherlock Holmes ‘wrote’ an educational treatise on the preservation of footprints, entitled “The tracing of footsteps, with some remarks upon the uses of Plaster of Paris as a preserver of impresses”. The techniques so described have become a mainstay in preserving prints of shoes, tires, tools and other depressions by police departments worldwide.


“We must look for consistency. Where there is a want of it we must suspect deception”
The Problem of Thor Bridge

5. Handwriting.

In Victorian London, handwriting was more prevalent than it is today. Holmes was able to deduce many details from the written word. By inspecting the pressure, angle, swirls and consistency, Holmes could tell the gender, class and maturity of the author. He could also make determinations about the character of the person whose penmanship was under scrutiny. In The Norwood Builder, Holmes determines by the timing of the imperfections in the scrawl of a will, that it was written aboard a train. Knowing that such an important document would not be transcribed in such a fashion, he correctly assumed duress.

Today, handwriting analysis is used to determine forgeries, psychological profiling and alterations in handwriting due to the influence of drugs, alcohol, duress, exhaustion or illness. The ransom note left at the scene of the JonBenet Ramsey murder was intensely scrutinized, and attempts were made to tie it to one of the parents, without conclusive results.


Your Turn: Do you know of any other techniques or methodologies used in the Sherlock Holmes stories that had real consequences for modern-day forensic science? Want to refute or rebuff some of the ways we tie Conan Doyle’s character to current detective work? Let us know in the comments. We’d love to hear from you.




  • Jan Burke says:

    The discovery of the potential of fingerprints to be used in criminal identification has an involved history over which there are various disputes, but in Europe publication of this idea goes back to at least 1863, when Professor Coulier published his findings in France, and in England, no later than 1880, when Dr. Henry Faulds discussed this in the magazine Nature. In the U.S., there is also publication of this use of fingerprints at least as early as 1877, and also earlier fictionally — in a story in Life in the Mississippi by Mark Twain, published in 1883.

    • You are correct, Jan. We have an upcoming article about the early fingerprint scientists who competed to develop a system that law enforcement could use effectively. It is a fascinating story, and an important milestone on the road to identifying and prosecuting criminals.

      Keep watching us, and thanks for your input.

  • Hey, I’m really fascinated by this article and was hoping to use it as a source for a research paper for my British Literature class. Could you please provide me with a date it was published and the author(s)? Thanks a lot!

    • The Forensic Outreach Team says:

      Hi Jonathan,

      It was published on February 26, 2014, and you can credit it to Forensic Outreach.

      Good luck with your paper!

      • Jonathan Brown says:

        Thank you very much for your help! Also, is your site a credible source? I can’t tell if this is a blog or “real” website.

      • Andy F. says:

        I hope you don’t mind me using this as well. I’m writing a paper about how Sherlock and Conan Doyle changed the game of detective fiction and forensic science.

  • Leo says:

    Hey, Jonathan. Good luck with your papers.

Leave a Reply